<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Convincing Illusions</title>
	<link>http://unscriptured.com/2006/10/10/convincing-illusions/</link>
	<description>and now, a word from our creator</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 04:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: josh</title>
		<link>http://unscriptured.com/2006/10/10/convincing-illusions/#comment-15</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://unscriptured.com/2006/10/10/convincing-illusions/#comment-15</guid>
					<description>&#62; all the experiences of our lives produce an inexorable cascade of chemical reactions in our bodies and brains and ultimately lead to whatever decisions we may reach

Since a central reoccurring theme of most major religions in the existence of some sort of extra-universal entity residing within our corporeal existence – e.g. the soul, wouldn’t this both provide a plausible explanation for any given subset of the processes that comprise thought could happen in a sphere beyond our ken – i.e. non-physical processes - as well as inculcate the existence of free will, and not simply a convincing illusion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; all the experiences of our lives produce an inexorable cascade of chemical reactions in our bodies and brains and ultimately lead to whatever decisions we may reach</p>
<p>Since a central reoccurring theme of most major religions in the existence of some sort of extra-universal entity residing within our corporeal existence – e.g. the soul, wouldn’t this both provide a plausible explanation for any given subset of the processes that comprise thought could happen in a sphere beyond our ken – i.e. non-physical processes - as well as inculcate the existence of free will, and not simply a convincing illusion?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: gglazer</title>
		<link>http://unscriptured.com/2006/10/10/convincing-illusions/#comment-12</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://unscriptured.com/2006/10/10/convincing-illusions/#comment-12</guid>
					<description>God the Watchmaker citing computer science theory is clearly Deus Ex Machina.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God the Watchmaker citing computer science theory is clearly Deus Ex Machina.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: some poor unfortunate soul</title>
		<link>http://unscriptured.com/2006/10/10/convincing-illusions/#comment-11</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://unscriptured.com/2006/10/10/convincing-illusions/#comment-11</guid>
					<description>Your metaphor is my Mephistopheles....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your metaphor is my Mephistopheles&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

